Tool kit

Aerial Survey

News Letter

Introduction

Aerial photography remains a powerful way to document and illustrate the landscapes of Wales and Ireland. The aerial perspective provides a landscape view and site context, the building blocks for broad-brush landscape characterisation and understanding the historic landscape. The bird’s eye view is a powerful way of exploring sites and landscapes, and for certain types of sites (e.g. cropmarks) is the only effective way of discovering monuments and placing them on record. Within CHERISH aerial photography provides an immediate record of the condition of eroding coastal sites, and allows entire regional coastlines to be rapidly surveyed from the air following storms. Beyond the archaeological uses for recording during primary reconnaissance, interpretation and mapping, they provide excellent materials for teaching and illustration.
Cropmarks from Littlegrange, Ireland, during CHERISH aerial surveys March 2019.
Cropmarks from Littlegrange, Ireland, during CHERISH aerial surveys March 2019.
The use of aerial photographs in archaeology has a history extending back more than 100 years and is recognised as one of the most effective ways of recording sites and landscapes. Archives of aerial photographs are a rich source for identifying otherwise unknown monuments and can provide unique records of landscapes and sites that have been changed or destroyed, while new aerial photography provides a means of recording during primary archaeological reconnaissance. There are three approaches to taking aerial photographs; firstly routine survey to photograph a pre-defined area of land (e.g. area-coverage vertical, usually for planning/cartography/military intelligence) and secondly archaeological reconnaissance by an airborne observer who photographs objects seen and understood to be of interest. The third, recent innovation has been the use of drones or Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) to carry out local aerial surveys of historic sites and buildings.

Aerial photography

Toby Driver carrying out an aerial survey from a light aircraft across the Wexford coastline
Toby Driver carrying out an aerial survey from a light aircraft across the Wexford coastline
Aerial reconnaissance is widely used around the world and is part of the wider discipline of ‘remote sensing’, surveying archaeology in the landscape without actually touching it, as one would do in an excavation. ‘Aerial archaeology’ encompasses a wide variety of survey and recording activities, from observing the landscape from above and actually taking the pictures to interpreting and mapping sites from the photographs taken. Aerial photography captured from a fixed-wing aircraft remains one of the most powerful tools to document and monitor the coastal heritage of Wales and Ireland. ‘Oblique’ aerial photographs taken at an angle to the ground give a more realistic landscape view of sites and monuments. ‘Vertical’ aerial photographs are taken looking straight down and look more like a map.
Carrying out surveys using a light aircraft means that hundreds of miles of coastline can be covered during periods of just 3-4 hours. The elevated perspective helps to clarify the layout of complex monuments, or show up features on a site which may be hidden from view or difficult to access at ground level.
The eroding Waterford coastline at Tramore during a CHERISH monitoring flight, September 2017.
The eroding Waterford coastline at Tramore during a CHERISH monitoring flight, September 2017.
Times of flights will vary with the seasons. Winter and spring is ideal for the photography of upstanding earthwork monuments, when low vegetation and low light allows all the details of a site to be picked out. Flat light or overcast conditions are preferred for recording monuments for Structure from Motion 3D modelling. Flights in summer droughts can reveal ‘cropmarks’ of buried or lost elements of an archaeological site, often with remarkable clarity
Surveying through the sea: the Sarn Padrig reef off the Gwynedd coast, Wales, seen from the air during summer reconnaissance. The reef is the site of numerous historic wrecks.
Surveying through the sea: the Sarn Padrig reef off the Gwynedd coast, Wales, seen from the air during summer reconnaissance. The reef is the site of numerous historic wrecks.
There is plenty to see when flying over the coastal, intertidal and maritime zone. As well as reconnaissance for, and discovery of, timber and stone built fish traps or wrecks and hulks, the search can be successfully extended for some distance offshore through shallow seas on very calm days when coastal waters may be remarkably clear. This is particularly important for recording wrecks which may show well against sandy sea beds.
Photos taken during CHERISH of eroding coastal archaeological sites will stand as a record of the condition of a monument long into the future, allowing comparison with historic aerial photographs taken from the 1940s onwards and charting future change. Powerful software also allows individual aerial photos taken from a drone or light aircraft in orbit around a site to be combined into a highly accurate 3D rotatable model (a process known as Structure from Motion).

Cropmarks

Illustration of how differential cropmarks appear as the rate of growth is impacted by the presence of archaeological features.
Illustration of how differential cropmarks appear as the rate of growth is impacted by the presence of archaeological features.
When archaeological features are buried they can affect the growth rate of the crops above them. The presence of features such as buried wall foundations or compacted floor surfaces produce a reduction in the soil depth and lower moisture levels than the surrounding land. Crops immediately above these features tend to have reduced growth rates in comparison to the plants above of no archaeological activity, producing “negative cropmarks”
In contrast areas where ditches, pits and other features have been dug into the subsoil become filled over time. This relative increase in soil depth and the potential to provide increased soil moisture enables the crops above to grow higher and ripen later than the plants around them, producing “positive cropmarks”. Both negative and positive cropmarks are more easily detected from the air and are usually visible during times of drought when crops are at maximum stress.
Cropmark of Early Bronze Age barrow at Goginan, west Wales.
Cropmark of Early Bronze Age barrow at Goginan, west Wales.

Soilmarks

Illustration of how human activity disturbs archaeology in the soil profile, leading to the appearance of soil marks.
Illustration of how human activity disturbs archaeology in the soil profile, leading to the appearance of soil marks.
Soilmarks Over time human activity has the potential to disturb the local soil profile. As humans dig pits or ditches into the soil or introduce new stone structures they can affect the viable appearance of the soil at the surface. Features such as pits and trenches over time become in-filled with material often different in nature than the surrounding undisturbed soil, including differences in texture (e.g. grain size) or colour. Buried structures such as walls and compacted stones can be brought to the surface by ploughing and are often brighter that the surrounding soil. Soilmarks are usually present after ploughing in the autumn or spring.

Related Content

Other Activities

Read More →

Videos

Aerial Archaeology

News Letter

Other Videos

Read More →

Videos

Stacks, cliffs & cauldrons of Castlemartin

News Letter

Other Videos

Read More →

Blog Posts

Stacks, Cliffs and Cauldrons

News Letter

Back to fieldwork

The Coronavirus epidemic has made 2020 an unusual and difficult year for millions of people. Along with most other organisations the staff of the Royal Commission in Wales, which leads the CHERISH Project, began home working in March 2020. Priority fieldwork recommenced in August, with each task requiring a robust business case and detailed risk assessment.

 

In mid August the CHERISH Team from the Royal Commission had their monitoring fieldwork on the Castlemartin Firing Range approved. The aim of this new fieldwork was to carry out the first aerial photogrammetric surveys by drone of the four principle coastal promontory forts, Linney Head, Flimston, Crocksydam and Buckspool/The Castle to provide baseline models to monitor future change. New topographic ground surveys were also needed for Buckspool and Crocksydam forts, which were last surveyed in the 1970s, while a possible ‘new’ promontory fort noted during aerial survey on Crickmail Down needed investigation.

 

Prehistoric rampart walling at Buckspool promontory fort
Prehistoric rampart walling at Buckspool promontory fort
Aerial photograph of Linney Head promontory fort from March 2018
Aerial photograph of Linney Head promontory fort from March 2018

Archaeological survey on a live firing range

 

 We can only carry out fieldwork during scheduled non-firing breaks on this very busy military range. While Flimston Bay promontory fort can be accessed on some evenings and weekends, Linney Head promontory fort lies in the live firing area and can only be visited when the entire range is closed, usually during Easter and August.

Although Dan and Toby on the team are qualified drone pilots, our drone surveys also required advanced permission from Cadw, the National Park, Natural Resources Wales and the Defence Infrastructure Organisation. We are grateful to all the staff we worked with to gain permission. The timing of the August survey avoided the sensitivities of cliff-nesting birds but we had to remain aware of early pupping seals on the beaches.

A diagram explaining the CHERISH Project’s ‘toolkit’ approach to surveying and recording archaeology and landscape change in the coastal zones of Wales and Ireland
A diagram explaining the CHERISH Project’s ‘toolkit’ approach to surveying and recording archaeology and landscape change in the coastal zones of Wales and Ireland

We made our first CHERISH Project visit to the range in March 2018 with colleagues from Aberystwyth University, but the first modern detailed surveys of Linney Head and Flimston forts were made a decade earlier by Louise from the Royal Commission in 2008. These earlier surveys, together with century-old maps and historic aerial photographs, provide excellent baselines against which to judge longer term patterns of erosion in the face of a changing climate.

Travelling in separate cars, and assigned separate sets of equipment, we made our first stop at Castlemartin Range Office early on the first day of fieldwork for the Range Briefing. This was to make sure we could identify and avoid any ordnance that might be lying around in the live firing areas.

Flimston Bay promontory fort from the air, March 2018
Flimston Bay promontory fort from the air, March 2018

Surveying at the edge of the cliffs

We were fortunate to have a week of hot, sunny and largely windless weather to conduct our drone surveys. The drone we fly is a Phantom IV Advanced, using software which allows us to pre-programme a gridded survey flight for photogrammetry, including setting altitude and ground resolution. Before starting the flight a network of control ‘crosses’ are fixed to the ground and surveyed in with GNSS (Global Navigation Satellite System) equipment so that the finished 3D model is accurately located to within a few centimetres or better.

Louise Barker surveying the rampart at Crocksydam, with Flimston Bay fort in the distance
Louise Barker surveying the rampart at Crocksydam, with Flimston Bay fort in the distance

The week started at Linney Head promontory fort in the live firing part of the range, with a condition check on the nearby Bulliber Camp too. Then we moved east to conduct a linked coastal drone survey of both Flimston Bay and Crocksydam promontory forts before finally relocating to near St Govan’s Head for access to Buckspool fort and the newly-identified site at Crickmail Down.

6m pole photography with a GoPro of the ‘Cauldron’ blowhole inside Flimston promontory fort
6m pole photography with a GoPro of the ‘Cauldron’ blowhole inside Flimston promontory fort

A new promontory fort, and an historic quarry quay

Crickmail down promontory fort as seen from the drone
Crickmail down promontory fort as seen from the drone

An interesting headland at Crickmail Down had looked like a potential promontory fort from aerial survey in 2018 but it required a ground visit to be sure. It was found that a definite causeway enters the fort between the eroded remains of two ditches. Inside there are traces of low stone walls, possibly from one or two small round houses. The character of the surviving low ramparts and infilled ditches suggests Crickmail Down may be earlier than the other more substantial promontory forts nearby, possibly dating to the Later Bronze Age.

We were also surprised to discover a tall stone wall in the coastal gully below the fort, set between high sea cliffs. This appears to be a loading platform for the historic limestone trade which flourished into the early years of the twentieth century. Although the wall is not marked on historic mapping, and not presently recorded, it would suggest a place where quarried stone was loaded onto waiting ships, similar to a loading quay at the tip of Flimston promontory fort.

The historic wall in a coastal gully below Crickmail Down
The historic wall in a coastal gully below Crickmail Down

Processing the results

View showing the flight path of the drone over Flimston promontory fort, capturing thousands of vertical photos in a survey grid
View showing the flight path of the drone over Flimston promontory fort, capturing thousands of vertical photos in a survey grid

These were the first archaeological drone surveys of the eroding cliffs at Castlemartin, leading to an extremely detailed 3D record of the cliff edge & forts and surpassing the old 2004 2-metre resolution airborne laser scanning (LiDAR) survey which can be viewed on the government’s Lle Portal.

During the week we surveyed 2.8km of coastline to 2cm resolution with the drone, flying 87.5 hectares of vertical photogrammetry and gathering around 3200 vertical images plus many obliques, as well as several minutes of aerial video. Processing all this data whilst homeworking has its challenges, but we are starting to produce finished models of the coastal sites.

The new 3D model of Flimston Bay (left) and Crocksydam (right) promontory forts and the limestone coastline inbetween
The new 3D model of Flimston Bay (left) and Crocksydam (right) promontory forts and the limestone coastline inbetween

The new 3D models for Flimston Bay and Crocksydam promontory forts show both sites in extraordinary detail. The design of Crocksydam is very different to the tall, curving ramparts of Flimston and it may be that these neighbouring sites had quite different purposes. These new 3D models provide the basis for new analysis of these interesting prehistoric coastal fortifications.

Location Map

2020 Survey

Read More →

Blog Posts

A new survey of Puffin Island

News Letter

Puffin Island or Ynys Seiriol/Priestholm rises in a steep ridge of limestone off the eastern coast of Anglesey in north Wales. This magical, privately owned island is home to protected seabirds, principally cormorants, and the ruins of an early medieval monastery. No public landing is allowed without the prior permission of the landowner.

The monastery of Priestholm, an early medieval foundation of which the listed and scheduled tower of the Augustinian priory church still stands proud on the island’s skyline, has long attracted visitors. In 1868 Herford Hopps carried out a basic survey of the buildings and discovered numerous skeletons around the church where rabbits had disturbed the bones. Harold Hughes returned in the final years of the nineteenth century to carry out more accurate surveys of the buildings and to continue with his own excavations, finding remains of an early shrine pre-dating the church tower. The Royal Commission first visited in 1929 to survey the island for their 1937 Anglesey Inventory. The only other substantial building on the island is the listed, ruined 19th century Telegraph station at the north-east point.

In modern times the island and ruins had become overgrown and lacked a modern survey. Therefore Puffin Island was selected as a new study site for the EU-funded CHERISH Project due to its general inaccessibility, the protected status of the buildings and to enable new, highly detailed surveys of the structures to be made to monitor future change and erosion. The CHERISH ‘toolkit’ approach meant that the island would be completely surveyed from the air, on the ground and from the sea.

In 2017 CHERISH commissioned new airborne laser scanning (‘LiDAR) of the entire island. The highly accurate laser penetrates the woodland canopy allowing trees and scrub vegetation to be digitally ‘stripped away’ in a computer. Using this technique we were able to map previously hidden fields, buildings and a new promontory enclosure to build a virtual view of the entire island.

Spectacular 3D LiDAR views of Puffin Island with and without its woodland vegetation
Spectacular 3D LiDAR views of Puffin Island with and without its woodland vegetation

Remote sensing can only tell part of the story. In June 2018 CHERISH and Cadw staff accompanied seabird specialist Dr Jonathan Green out to Puffin Island in something resembling a ‘Famous 5’ adventure, beginning with a boat landing among basking seals on the western beach. Negotiating chest-deep grass and brambles and crawling under branches of low trees whilst carrying heavy survey equipment, we reached the peace and solitude of the 800 year old church. The limestone Romanesque tower looked quite continental in the June sun. Seagull chicks looked on as we laser scanned the tower.

Later that summer the Geological Survey of Ireland carried out marine bathymetry along the east Anglesey coast, monitoring wrecks and mapping the inshore island waters. We returned in decidedly colder weather in November 2018 to fly a drone over the tower to gather 3D photos of the parts the laser scanner couldn’t reach.

The new surveys generated state-of-the-art 3D records of the medieval priory church and associated structures, allowing any future change to be measured to within a few millimetres. The marine survey data has been linked to the LiDAR to produce a remarkable seamless onshore/offshore 3D map of the entire island. The current lockdown and a break from active fieldwork has provided the opportunity to write up the various surveys into a substantial archive report, which will be made available during 2020.

3D drone photogrammetry of the church tower
3D drone photogrammetry of the church tower

The CHERISH Team hope to return to Puffin Island in 2021 to make a final monitoring visit of the medieval ruins, and to savour the peace and isolation on this wilderness island one last time.

See our online records for Puffin Island here:

Find out more here

Location Map

Read More →
en_GBEN